For this project, I interviewed Chris Burr, a second-time Nobles faculty member and a man born right in the heart of the baby boom in 1950. I started out with the more general questions given to us, then moving on to the more specific questions that I myself thought up. Mr. Burr said that the political events that first shaped him occurred in the 1960's, when John F. Kennedy was assassinated followed in a matter of years by the assassinations of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Robert Kennedy. He then went on to say that these events combined with the Vietnam War to create a situation filled with chaos in the United States. He believed that much of this chaos was directly related to the United States "losing their first war". Relating back to the essential question, this shows that many Americans were shaken by the Vietnam War, as it was clear that the United States was not exactly the military super-power it had believed itself to be. As the interview moved along, we also discussed both Watergate and Ronald Reagan. Mr. Burr described his feelings upon first hearing about the Watergate break-in, saying that he felt that it was a significant story even before the connections to the President were made and also describing how he wondered what would happen if President Nixon was connected to the break-in. As the story moved along, Mr. Burr said that he was very struck by the Watergate story and he felt that the notion of the American president lying was something very foreign and disturbing to him. For Mr. Burr, it seems, the Watergate scandal had a similar effect on him as it did on many other Americans--it "shook {them} up" and made them doubt politicians. Ronald Reagan, he believed, was the perfect president for his specific time period. In effect, Mr. Burr believed that Reagan reinstilled the confidence and faith in Americans that had been missing since the tumultuous 1960's and 1970's. He said that the Carter presidency was a complete disaster, and that Reagan was an effective President who reasserted America internationally and positively impacted average Americans via his strong rhetoric and confidence. My question asked specifically about how the media acted toward Reagan, and Mr. Burr believed that the media was never really able to nail Reagan the way that they had been able to with Presidents such as Nixon and Carter. He did concede that the press finally got Reagan with the Iran-Contra scandal, but his overall feeling was that this was a mere kink in Reagan's armor that did not really effect the overall public sentiment of Reagan's presidency.